01
Business process audit
We describe how the process works today, where data and time are lost and what is worth automating first.
Less manual work
We help organise enquiries, data and repetitive operations. We start with the process, define rules and retain human control where it is needed.
Enquiries, orders or statuses are moved between forms, spreadsheets and systems. We check which steps can be connected and carried out without repeated manual entry.
Enquiries get lost between teams, while ownership and status are unclear. We build an agreed workflow with rules, checks and notifications.
A repetitive process needs to become reproducible. We describe the logic, data sources, exceptions and controls before automating execution.
SERVICES
You can start with a process audit or a specific task. We can combine services within one project.
01
We describe how the process works today, where data and time are lost and what is worth automating first.
02
We select or configure a CRM for your sales process, migrate data and train your team.
03
We connect your website, CRM, payments, accounting, messengers and spreadsheets so data does not need to be transferred manually.
04
Enquiries enter the workflow without getting lost: assignment, reminders, statuses and deadline tracking.
05
Automated email and messaging workflows, segments and data exchange between marketing services.
06
Documents, approvals, orders and tasks moving between teams according to agreed rules.
07
Bots and AI assistants that answer common questions, collect details and hand conversations to a person.
08
Reports and dashboards compiled from your systems without manual copying.
09
We monitor workflows and integrations, fix failures and refine the logic.
We look for repetitive actions with definable inputs, rules and expected outcomes. The goal is to remove unnecessary information transfers and waiting between steps, rather than automate an undefined process at any cost.
Before implementation, we examine exceptions: what happens when data is missing, an external system is unavailable or a responsible person must decide. We automate what has working rules and retain human control where risk and responsibility require it.
Receive an enquiry, validate required fields, assign responsibility and pass data to the working system without re-entry.
Connect agreed ordering, payment and fulfilment steps. We check integration availability and accounting requirements before promising automation.
Create agreed documents or notifications from a defined event and data. Templates, access and sending rules are agreed separately.
Collect information from the required sources, validate it and pass it to a report or another system. The result must be understandable to the person using it.
We compare options: configuring an existing tool, integrating through available interfaces, a standalone workflow or custom development. We consider launch, maintenance, external charges, vendor dependence and security requirements.
We do not declare automation worthwhile simply because it can be built. Together, we assess the operation’s frequency, manual involvement, cost of errors and support complexity. When an existing solution meets the need, there is no reason to sell more code.
We document what triggers the process, which data it requires and what should happen. Your team should know where to check the result.
We provide event logging, retries where safe and alerts to the responsible person for situations that cannot be resolved automatically.
We agree who maintains integrations, how rules are updated and what happens when an external service changes. Support scope is based on the process.
HOW WE WORK
We discuss the process, frequency of actions, available systems and problems. We decide whether it is worth automating now and which step to start with.
Once the collaboration is agreed, we document sources, rules, exceptions and expected outcomes. We check the technical capabilities of the connections.
We implement the workflow and test normal operation and agreed error cases. We clarify who receives notifications and how work is restored.
We agree the transition to use, hand over explanations and define support. New rules are introduced in a controlled way, not through unnoticed changes.
Logic specification, solution selection, configuration or development, testing and agreed implementation. We explain dependencies and how to monitor results.
We need a process owner, real data examples, access within the agreed scope and confirmed rules. It is important to decide who handles exceptional decisions and responds to error alerts.
PROJECT BUDGET
Cost depends on the number of systems, available connections, complexity of rules, data and exceptions. We assess not just building the workflow, but also the controls and implementation required. Sometimes configuring a tool you already pay for is enough.
Licences, third-party service limits, server resources and support are separated from the initial implementation. We do not promise percentage savings without measuring your process.
FAQ
Send it through the form and we will reply.
Go to formProcesses with definable inputs, rules and outputs: for example, enquiry handovers, status updates, report preparation or data synchronisation. We check feasibility against your systems and access.
Not necessarily. Configuring or integrating existing tools is often enough. We suggest a custom system when a simpler option does not meet requirements or is poor value in the long term.
From specific, clearly defined actions, yes, where technically and operationally appropriate. Exceptions, significant decisions or incomplete data may still need human review. We define that boundary before implementation.
We agree how to detect the error, notify the responsible person and retry or handle it manually. The implementation depends on the available tools and process requirements.
We assess whether the particular workflow needs them. If a simple rule solves the task better, we do not add a more complex tool. We define boundaries and controls for ambiguous responses and important actions.
Choose a repetitive task your team can describe using a real example. We compare complexity, frequency and the value of changes, then suggest a sequence rather than automating everything at once.
YOUR NEXT STEP
Describe it in your own words. We will identify what can be removed from manual work.